Wednesday, April 23rd, 2014
A poll in this week’s Scotland on Sunday suggests that English born Scots currently intend to vote 2:1 against independence.
I was born in England and I will once again be supporting England in this summer’s World Cup finals. Having moved to Scotland 38 years ago, I think of myself as neither English nor Scottish, defaulting to ‘British’ when asked my nationality.
But independence is not about flags, labels or the past. It’s about the future of the country I call home and below is a transcript of a speech I gave at a recent public meeting organised by Yes Midlothian spelling out why I am passionate about independence and will be voting Yes on September 18th.
It is now less than six months to the referendum. Looking back to six months ago, I was to say the least, lukewarm towards Independence.
Yes, I felt it would put Scotland in a place it belonged and one day it would happen anyway – it just seemed to be the direction we were heading.
I was never in doubt that we could manage economically and surviving as an independent nation was never an issue for me. Now that even David Cameron has said the same, it is no longer an issue for anyone.
Six months ago, while I supported Independence, I was not passionate about it, simply because I had other priorities.
However, it was only when listening to Robin McAlpine, who gave a presentation to the Scottish Greens’ conference in October, that I began to realise that the changes I want to see can only happen in an independent Scotland.
That’s not to say they definitely will happen but that as things stand, they definitely won’t as part of the UK.
So what priorities do the Greens have?
We live in a world with finite resources. If humanity is to survive, we need to manage those resources better.
The pie isn’t getting any bigger and if anything it will need to get smaller if catastrophic destruction of the planet is to be avoided.
Importantly, we need to look at how we share out what we already have rather than relying on a fragile model of exploitation of resources and people to fuel a wasteful and consumer obsessed world.
And this can only be achieved by reducing inequality.
Reducing inequality also brings many other benefits.
Anyone who has read ‘The Spirit Level’ by Wilkinson and Pickett, will be convinced that reducing inequality is also the key to reducing many of the social problems we face – their study looked at
Level of Trust
Mental Illness including drug & alcohol addiction
Life expectancy & infant mortality
Children’s educational performance
And social mobility
They looked at all of these across over 20 countries and across each of the states in the US (to show it’s inequality, not the wealth of a country which is the problem). In all cases there was a close co-relation between all of these problems and inequality. Reduce inequality and each of these problems diminishes.
We’ve heard a lot about the Nordic countries in the independence debate and how countries like Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland have lower levels of inequality, and as the Spirit Level shows, these countries display lower levels of social problems like those I’ve described.
That surely must be what we aspire to.
The UK is the fourth most unequal country in the world.
The top fifth of people in the UK earn around 14 times that of the bottom fifth.
Where the five richest families are now wealthier than the bottom 20% combined.
London is the most unequal city in the developed world.
So I ask myself, is a more equal society more likely in an independent Scotland or is it more likely to come from Westminster?
In the UK, inequality has steadily risen over the last few decades – even under Labour governments.
Witness the rise of the food bank.
Westminster MPs voted last month to cap the total Welfare bill in a race to prove to likely Tory or UKIP voters that their party will continue to bring down the deficit by austerity.
At Westminster, the debate on taxation revolves around whether the richest pay 45 or 50 pence in the pound on their income. Commitments on the Minimum Wage revolve around whether or not it should be increased in line with inflation.
The Bedroom Tax, like the Poll Tax before it, was imposed by a Westminster government against the will of the vast majority of Scots.
Surely we can do better than this.
In Scotland, the emphasis is different.
Here, we were the first to oppose the Poll Tax. We seek to extend the Living Wage and abolish the Bedroom Tax.
We introduced the Right to Roam, we’re giving more rights to communities in land reform and we embraced proportional representation for both our parliament and local councils.
Yes, the emphasis is different here.
Voters and politicians in many political parties in Scotland share my desire to reduce inequality.
Independence would give us the chance to work together to do that.
The most exciting change politically is that the Labour Party would be re-invigorated and could once again become the force for change it once was.
No longer shackled to following the opinion polls of Middle England, it would be freed to work with all of us in this country who want to see the benefits of a more equal society.
But it’s more than a more equal society that we could work together for.
We’ve heard of Devo Max, Devo Plus, Devo Nano. Whatever powers are promised, they will not enable us to do other things that I, and I believe, the majority of Scots want to see.
It would not remove the obscenity of nuclear weapons from our shores.
While we can regulate for home insulation but we cannot regulate our energy companies.
We would have greater control over the levers of our economy.
But we are told that if we use Sterling, we might not have any control over monetary policy.
Ten years ago, the debate in Scotland was that interest rates were too high and were hurting the Scottish economy. The Bank of England told us they had to be high to dampen the housing boom in the south east of England.
And we are told that Scotland is too small to bail out failing banks.
Is Scotland too small, or the banks too big?
If we fix the bank problem, then the country problem goes away.
We can regulate rail fares, but cannot bring the railways back into public ownership where they belong.
Our cherished postal service has just been sold off cheaply to the delight of City of London investors.
I, and I believe most of Scotland, want it back.
We have no written constitution and an unelected House of Lords
I would like a head of state not chosen by God, but elected by the people.
Of the four elections we vote in, only one is not by a fairer proportional system – yes, the one to Westminster.
Then we’re told that an independent Scotland’s status would be diminished on the world stage.
Conservative minister Kenneth Clark recently told the Scottish Tory conference that an independent Scotland would have the same influence as Malta.
Malta, with a population less than Edinburgh, has five Members of the European Parliament.
As part of the UK, Scotland currently has six.
Finland, Denmark and Slovakia, on the other hand, with populations roughly the same as Scotland, each have thirteen.
Six months ago I was lukewarm about Scottish independence because I didn’t see it as a priority. Now I am passionate about Scottish independence because all my priorities depend on it.
Wednesday, April 9th, 2014
After a tragedy such as the death of Keane Wallis-Bennett, the immediate and only thoughts are with the family and friends of Keane.
Even with a daughter of my own of the same age, also in S1 at a neighbouring school, I can only glimpse the deep grief and pain everyone will be feeling.
As initial numbness gives way to understandable anger, all councillors have a duty to do everything we can to prevent such a tragedy happening ever again.
Exactly what went wrong in Liberton High School, we will know in due course. But, more generally, it has been clear for some time that there is a long-term problem of investment in and repair of school buildings.
For decades the school estate in Edinburgh has been neglected, so the decision to commission surveys for the whole school estate was both brave and necessary.
The staff who took that necessary step should be thanked for facing up to that long-term neglect and laying out the simple facts for all to see.
The level of investment needed is stark: £90.6 million. The repairs and maintenance bill is £29.1m and improvements are costed at £61.5m.
However, this year’s budget was agreed with only half of the funding for improvements identified over the next five years. Even more glaringly, the council’s budget has only £4.2m per year for maintenance and planned work across the entire council estate, while £8m is needed just for schools and related buildings for each of the next two years, as part of that £29.1m total bill.
So the current annual budget of £4.2m is only half of what is needed for schools and children’s centres, never mind libraries, depots and other public buildings.
This is why officers have warned that the current repairs budget is so under-funded that it ‘will impact little on required works’.
The council also needs to adopt planned preventative maintenance programmes for schools. As anyone who has to maintain a home knows, the rapid downwards spiral that results from neglect is a false economy. We have been warned.
Back in March, as a member of the council’s audit committee, I asked for school repairs and conditions to be closely examined by the committee and will press for this to happen as soon as possible. That should help secure consensus about what needs to happen.
So, crucially, how much do we need? And how do we get it?
An additional £10.5m a year would allow the repairs backlog to be addressed in full and fund the additional borrowing needed to improve schools.
£10.5m is £1 a week extra on council tax. I propose that the city council goes to the Scottish Government and makes the case for this as a special school repair and improvement levy. £1 a week, earmarked only for schools, and sitting outside the terms of the council tax freeze.
£1 a week: surely a small price for a well maintained school estate: no less than Edinburgh needs and future generations deserve.
This post originally appeared on the Edinburgh Greens website.
Thursday, March 27th, 2014
It was no surprise that Midlothian councillors decided this week not to accept officers’ recommendations that Bonnyrigg Leisure Centre be demolished. Given the overwhelming publicity in the media and opposition by MSPs Alison Johnstone and Colin Beattie, to do so would be electoral suicide for councillors voting for it, not to mention the prospect of images of people chained to the building as the bulldozers arrive featuring on national television (a very real possibility, according to my sources). (more…)
Wednesday, March 26th, 2014
When I lived in Augsburg, Bavaria, between 1998 and 2000, I took the tram for granted. It was quick, reliable and affordable. Augsburg has a population around half the size of Edinburgh yet has 6 separate tram lines stretching for over 25 miles. Other continental cities are the same: trams are a normal part of a modern public transport system.
And yet trams in Edinburgh have become a byword for financial and administrative mess. The budget is overspent, the construction is late and the roadworks have seemed never-ending. The handling of the trams project has embarrassed the city.
Leith has suffered all the pain but, as yet, has none of the gain. Businesses have suffered and some may have gone bust as a result of the tramworks.
Some of my constituents want an immediate end to the pain: Leith has suffered enough. We should reinstate Leith Walk to its previous state as soon as possible and should not even entertain the prospect of trams coming to Leith, they say. I’ve been critical of the horrendous mismanagement of the tram project and share the anger of these residents and businesses.
But many more of my constituents (a majority of those who contact me about this issue) say they want to see a benefit from all this pain and disruption. They want to see trams come to Leith. And I agree with them. Leith deserves the high-quality public transport system that many cities of our size take for granted: a clean, efficient tram system.
We need to be realistic about when this can be achieved. There is no prospect of work being funded by the current council or the current Scottish Government in the near future. We should, of course, learn the lessons of the tram line that is currently undergoing testing, from the airport to St Andrews Square and should wait until this line has completely bedded in. But I will continue to argue for investment in high-quality modern public transport systems and all the benefits it brings. Benefits such as local environmental improvements, better mobility for citizens, especially those without access to a car, and the investment that the tram has recently brought to some sections of the airport – city centre route.
The tram project has brought the city seven years of pain. I believe we are now about to see the gain. And that should include Leith as well.
This post originally appeared on the Edinburgh Greens website.
Tuesday, March 25th, 2014
I’m calling on Midlothian Council to rethink plans to demolish Bonnyrigg Leisure Centre.
Community campaigners trying to save the centre received my support last summer but it has emerged that councillors will be invited next week (Tue 25 Mar) to approve demolition. (more…)
Tuesday, March 4th, 2014
Ofcom’s decision to grant UKIP priority status in May’s European elections is an insult to Scotland, writes Patrick Harvie. (more…)
Wednesday, February 19th, 2014
Last week, The Trump Organization announced it was withdrawing its planning application to build a second golf course at Menie and has abandoned its scheme to construct a large golf resort at the site.
This is not a huge surprise, given Mr Trump’s track record elsewhere. For the last few years, the very slow pace of progress on the Menie development, the procrastination and delay, have strongly suggested Mr Trump was seeking an exit strategy – but wanted to be able to blame someone else for his decision not to proceed. His way out has been to blame the Scottish Government.
Mr Trump has now used the First Minister twice. Back in 2007, to help progress his planning application. Now, as the scapegoat for his decision to stop work on the development. Mr Salmond has been played.
Mr Trump is claiming the proposed wind farm in Aberdeen Bay is the reason for his decision. It has been suggested by some that the proposed wind farm should have been moved or abandoned to appease Mr Trump. Firstly, the turbines planned for Aberdeen Bay will not be an ‘ordinary’ wind farm, but a test centre crucial to developing the renewables industry in the North-east, and so of great economic importance to the region. Secondly, Mr Trump has been making threats and unreasonable demands from the start. You don’t appease an arrogant, irrational bully. It doesn’t work. They only come back wanting even more.
Mr Trump’s tendency to change his position and contradict himself, means we cannot be sure that he will not say something quite different next week. But I do think this probably is Mr Trump walking away from continuing work on his Menie development.
Of course, the Scottish Government should never have stepped in to grant Mr Trump planning permission in the first place. We have lost an important and beautiful natural area that was legally protected as a Site of Special Scientific Interest. Our duty, as I saw it, was to hand this natural heritage over to following generations intact, so they could enjoy it and wonder at and better understand nature. Instead, it has become a golf course. The justification for allowing this damage to the environment was the jobs and economic benefit the proposed golf resort would bring. While the scale of the economic benefit promised by Mr Trump was clearly ridiculously exaggerated, there is no doubt that, had the resort gone ahead, there would have been some job creation and economic activity as a result. As it is, the North-east has got the worst of all possible worlds. We have lost our irreplaceable, natural, mobile dune system – for negligible economic return.
Mr Trump, clearly, should never have been given planning permission.
Friday, February 14th, 2014
This is the text of a speech given by Fabio Villani at the Lossiemouth Independence Information Meeting on 7th February 2014
Mr Chairman, ladies and gentlemen … thank you very much for inviting me here tonight.
It’s great to see so many of you willing to come out on a this bright but chilly February night to discuss the future of Scotland. (more…)
Tuesday, February 4th, 2014
The Scottish Parliament has just voted same-sex marriage into law 105-18! We are absolutely delighted – Greens all over the world have been campaigning for marriage equality for decades.
It’s been a long road to this historic achievement. Patrick Harvie made his first speeches in Parliament demanding marriage equality a decade ago, before there were even civil partnerships. Here he is speaking almost exactly two years ago, at the start of the campaign for the law Holyrood passed today:
And you can read his speech in the first Holyrood debate on the new Marriage and Civil Partnerships Bill, and watch it below (begin at 28 minutes 55 seconds):
This morning, Patrick said:
“Holyrood may have taken a little longer to reach the final stage today, but for once we’ve ended up with better law as a result. The rights of transgender people as well as same-sex couples are being respected, and I’ll be delighted to see the Bill pass with a substantial majority.”
We’ll have the video and transcript from his barnstorming speech this afternoon up here as soon as it’s available.
Monday, February 3rd, 2014
When the SNP took up the reins of government in 2007, one of its flagship promises was to freeze council tax.
Since council tax is a local council responsibility, this was a promise that Scottish Government had no direct means to deliver. It had to persuade councils to freeze council tax through making an annual payment or “holdback”, which, in Edinburgh, is just short of £7 million. (more…)